Mamdani’s primary win jolts legal industry

June 26, 2025, 11:07 AM UTC

Progressive courts. A revamped Law Department. An end to Rikers.

New York public-interest attorneys have high hopes for a potential Zohran Mamdani mayoralty. But their private firm peers are wary.

While some aspects of the democratic socialist’s agenda — like tax hikes on the wealthy — would require approval from Albany, his influence on the city’s courts and law-enforcement would have fewer checks. The mayor appoints city court judges and leaders of the city’s Law Department, Police Department, Department of Correction, and Department of Investigation.

“A Mayor Mamdani would be a breath of fresh air for access to justice,” said Steve Banks, the ex-New York City Department of Social Services commissioner and ex-Legal Aid head who’s now doing legal work on behalf of the homeless, indigent and nonprofits after leaving Paul Weiss.

“But no one should be measuring the drapes right now, because there is still work to be done,” Banks told me, “and he has built a campaign that is laser focused on taking on each challenge as it comes.”

Mamdani won a stunning upset victory over Andrew Cuomo, a former three-term governor, in Tuesday’s New York City mayoral Democratic primary. In the general election, Mamdani is facing Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, and Mayor Eric Adams and attorney Jim Walden, both running as independents. Cuomo hasn’t decided if he’ll mount an independent bid.

A 33-year-old state legislator representing Queens, Mamdani had the backing of a 4,000-person indigent legal services union, the Association of Legal Advocates and Attorneys. Cuomo had a $25 million political action committee with cash from Sullivan & Cromwell partners and high-profile practitioners like Roberta Kaplan.

“It would be revolutionary to have a mayor who has stood beside advocates for closing Rikers, ending solitary confinement, and holding police accountable,” Eliza Orlins, a Manhattan-based public defender and Mamdani backer who mounted an unsuccessful 2021 bid for district attorney, told me. “It would be life-changing for our clients to expand things like diversion courts and restorative justice.”

The enthusiasm isn’t industrywide in the nation’s largest legal market. While New York City attorneys tend to lean liberal, Mamdani may be too far left for some, and he’s raised concerns in the business world, which makes up part of Big Law’s clientele.

For lawyers looking for an alternative, Walden should hold appeal if Cuomo doesn’t run, said Daniel R. Alonso, a white-collar defense attorney at Vedder Price in Manhattan.

“I have huge concerns about who Mamdani would appoint,” Alonso said, adding New York has “a public-safety problem” that Mamdani’s picks could exacerbate. “I’d like to think Big Law is going to do what I did, which is look at Walden and realize he is Mr. Integrity and not an ideologue,” Alonso said. (Mamdani’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment.)

Alonso is not alone, according to other lawyers I spoke to. “Many in Big Law have real concerns about what a Mamdani administration would mean,” veteran Wall Street attorney Richard Farley told me.

Some high-profile attorneys have already flocked to Walden, an ex-Gibson Dunn partner who’s now a partner at Walden Macht Haran & Williams. Former Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, who’s now a Baker McKenzie partner, co-hosted a Walden campaign fundraiser in May, a Walden campaign spokesperson said.

But progressive attorneys are sticking with Mamdani — and dreaming big.

Arthur Z. Schwartz, general counsel at Center for the Independence of the Disabled, New York and a longtime labor lawyer for unions, said he’d like to see Mamdani reshape the law department, called Corporation Counsel.

“I think he’s going to wind up appointing someone very creative who’s going to transform that office into one that isn’t automatically saying, ‘The city’s right, you’re wrong,’ which would be wonderful,” Schwartz told me. “He can tell his corporation counsel to be on the side of community groups suing the city.”

Also Read: Calculate Your Gain Under a New SALT Cap

Complaint of the Day: Nassau ICE Arrest Plan Challenged

The New York Civil Liberties Union sued Nassau County in state court Tuesday over the Long Island county’s agreement with ICE to have Nassau police officers make immigration arrests. The officers aren’t authorized to do so under New York law, the complaint says. A spokesman for Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman said Blakeman is “confident that all measures taken to protect communities in Nassau are legal.” Read more from Beth Wang.

Finance

In the Courts

OpenAI Must Produce Profit Projections in AI Copyright Suit

A federal magistrate judge ordered OpenAI Inc. to produce documents on its financial projections shared with investors including Microsoft Corp. and Softbank Group Corp. at a hearing Wednesday as part of discovery for news organizations’ copyright infringement suit against the AI company.

Authors Say Microsoft Trained AI Using Their Pirated Works

A group of authors allege Microsoft Corp. unlawfully used pirated versions of their copyrighted works to train its artificial intelligence large language model, according to a new federal lawsuit.

Sika, Other Concrete Firms Get Federal Price-Fixing Suits Tossed

Sika AG, Cie. de Saint-Gobain SA, and other firms convinced a judge in New York Wednesday to toss claims accusing them of conspiring to fix the price of concrete components.

Teladoc Health to Face Bulk of Pixel Tracking, Data Sharing Suit

Teladoc Health Inc. failed to convince a federal judge Wednesday to toss most claims that the telehealth provider improperly disclosed patients’ sensitive health data when it installed the Facebook tracking pixel on its website.

SUNY College Accused by Professor of LGBTQ+ Discrimination

A former philosophy professor at Farmingdale State College of the State University of New York claims in a new lawsuit that the school “engaged in a sustained pattern of discrimination against members of the LGBTQ+ community.”

British Man Charged by US in ‘IntelBroker’ Company Data Hacks

A 25-year-old British man known as “IntelBroker” was accused by US authorities of conspiring with a group of hackers to steal data from dozens of companies and offer it for sale online, causing more than $25 million in damages to victims around the world.

Policy & Politics

Treasury Close to Deal That Would Make ‘Revenge Tax’ Irrelevant

The Treasury Department is nearing a deal that would make the so-called “revenge tax” irrelevant, the agency’s second-in-command said, a development that could bring great relief to Wall Street investors worried about punitive tax measures on foreigners.

Republicans ‘Far From’ Deal on SALT Limit, New Yorker Says

House Republicans from high-tax states remain at loggerheads with the Senate GOP over limits on the state and local tax deduction despite a meeting with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to try to resolve differences, a New York lawmaker said.

Judicial Pick Bove Says He ‘Never’ Advised Violating Rulings

Justice Department official and judicial nominee Emil Bove denied whistleblower allegations that he suggested that government lawyers ignore court orders against the Trump administration’s deportation policy.

Business & Practice

Ex-Trump Lawyer, Kasowitz Firm Co-Founder Start New Venture

Three ex-partners from the firm started by prominent litigator Marc Kasowitz, including one of the co-founders, have formed their own law operation.

Pillsbury Recruits John Storz as Partner From Paul Hastings

John Storz joined Pillsbury as a partner in its insolvency and restructuring practice in New York, the firm announced Tuesday.

Milbank’s Katyal, Wilson Sonsini’s McConnell Fight Trump Tariffs

Neal Katyal and his firm Milbank, which promised free legal services for President Donald Trump’s causes, has joined a court fight against the president’s tariffs.

Commentary & Opinion

NY Courts Offer Little Escape for Contracts Upended by Tariffs

Steptoe attorneys Chris Paparella, Justin Ben-Asher, and Kirsten Bickelman examine how New York courts have ruled on an array of legal theories that parties can try using to escape terms of a contract affected by the trade war.

Editor’s Picks

To contact the reporter on this story: Mike Vilensky at mvilensky@bloombergindustry.com

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Sei Chong at schong@bloombergindustry.com

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn About Bloomberg Law

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.