Uber Rider Describes Palisades Fire Suspect’s ‘Incel Energy’
An
An
Emcasco Insurance Co. ended its lawsuit against a Texas-based stone slab distributor over liability coverage for litigation brought by a fabrication worker who allegedly died from exposure to silica contained in stone products.
An oil and gas service contractor came up short in its federal appeals court bid to avoid liability for its role in an accident that injured one of its workers and killed two others employed by other companies.
Lawmakers’ push to amend the Toxic Substances Control Act is being met with far less consensus on potential changes than 10 years ago, when Congress first overhauled the law.
A common flame retardant used for commercial, industrial, and consumer purposes presents few unreasonable risks, the EPA said in a draft evaluation released Friday.
A former chemical plant worker sued BASF Corporation for failing to pay overtime wages for time spent putting on and taking off safety equipment, claiming the company violated federal and Ohio wage laws.
For Big Law’s sports industry partners, the most eventful summer in New York’s recent history is emerging as a low-stakes, corporate-tinged social tightrope. The payoff is meaningful time to bond shoulder-to-shoulder with clients.
Jonathan Rinderknecht has been wrongly
The biggest law firms are admitting a smaller share of partners into ownership ranks, a tactic used to reserve profit distributions for lawyers who bring in the most business.
The lasting imprint of fires that ripped through Los Angeles last year was on display in federal court on Tuesday as attorneys agreed to a 12-person jury to decide whether Jonathan Rinderknecht is responsible for starting the Palisades Fire.



As employers are making plans to return to their workplaces. How quickly they succeed will likely depend on how many of their employees get vaccinated.
Employer contests a four-item serious citation in 11 parts and $53,976 fine. The serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1910.134(c)(1), for failure to establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures; 29.C.F.R. 1910.134(e)(1), for failure to provide a medical evaluation to determine an employee’s ability to use a respirator before the employee was required to use the respirator in the workplace; and 29.C.F.R. 1910.134(f)(2), for failure to ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting face-piece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator. (20-0329)
Employer contests a three-item serious citation and $6,998 fine and a repeat citation and $8,906 fine. The serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1926.102(a)(1), for failure to ensure that eye and face protective equipment was used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury; 29.C.F.R. 1926.1053(b)(1), for failure to secure portable ladders used to access an upper landing surface against displacement; and 29.C.F.R. 1926.1053(b)(13), for failure to ensure that the top step of a stepladder was not used as a step. (20-0330)
Employer contests a two-item serious citation and $12,337 fine and a two-item other-than-serious citation with no fine. The serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1910.36(d)(1), for failure to ensure that employees were able to open exit route doors from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge; and 29.C.F.R. 1910.178(l)(4)(iii), for failure to conduct an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator performance at least once every three years. The other-than-serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1910.157(e)(3), for failure to perform annual maintenance checks on fire extinguishers. (20-0317)
Get the latest legal, regulatory, and enforcement news and analysis, as well as in-depth business and industry covering in the following areas: