Construction Firm Disputes Fine for Baltimore Bridge Fatalities
The construction firm that had workers on the Francis Scott Key Bridge at the time of its collapse is contesting a proposed serious fine with Maryland’s state safety agency.
The construction firm that had workers on the Francis Scott Key Bridge at the time of its collapse is contesting a proposed serious fine with Maryland’s state safety agency.
An
An administrative law judge affirmed two serious fall protection and ladder safety violations against a Rochester, N.Y., commercial roofing company, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration announced Thursday.
Landlords, renovators, schools, and day care facilities dealing with lead-paint contaminated properties face tougher cleanup standards under a final rule to protect children the EPA released Thursday.
A Pennsylvania company that provides manufacturing and support services unlawfully fired a worker after he made safety complaints, the US Labor Department alleged in a new lawsuit.
New York City workers would be guaranteed paid time off to care for pets or service animals under a bill introduced to the NYC Council, an unusual twist in employment law.
A cracked skull. A foot fracture. A back laceration so severe it required surgery. An amputated finger.
A manager whose workers were the first Amazon drivers in the US to unionize has sued the e-commerce giant over the termination of his company’s contract.
Senate Majority Leader

As employers are making plans to return to their workplaces. How quickly they succeed will likely depend on how many of their employees get vaccinated.
Employer contests a four-item serious citation in 11 parts and $53,976 fine. The serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1910.134(c)(1), for failure to establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures; 29.C.F.R. 1910.134(e)(1), for failure to provide a medical evaluation to determine an employee’s ability to use a respirator before the employee was required to use the respirator in the workplace; and 29.C.F.R. 1910.134(f)(2), for failure to ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting face-piece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator. (20-0329)
Employer contests a three-item serious citation and $6,998 fine and a repeat citation and $8,906 fine. The serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1926.102(a)(1), for failure to ensure that eye and face protective equipment was used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury; 29.C.F.R. 1926.1053(b)(1), for failure to secure portable ladders used to access an upper landing surface against displacement; and 29.C.F.R. 1926.1053(b)(13), for failure to ensure that the top step of a stepladder was not used as a step. (20-0330)
Employer contests a two-item serious citation and $12,337 fine and a two-item other-than-serious citation with no fine. The serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1910.36(d)(1), for failure to ensure that employees were able to open exit route doors from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge; and 29.C.F.R. 1910.178(l)(4)(iii), for failure to conduct an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator performance at least once every three years. The other-than-serious citation includes the alleged violation of 29.C.F.R. 1910.157(e)(3), for failure to perform annual maintenance checks on fire extinguishers. (20-0317)
Get the latest legal, regulatory, and enforcement news and analysis, as well as in-depth business and industry covering in the following areas: