Legal Exchange: Insights & Commentary

Kirkland Signals Meaningful but Not Transformational AI Future

Kirkland & Ellis’s $500 million investment in artificial intelligence isn’t likely to translate to a fundamental change in the Kirkland business model—or in the Big Law model generally—that will lead to immediate discounts for clients, Baretz + Brunelle’s Casey Flaherty writes.

Kirkland $500 Million AI Bid Highlights Access-to-Justice Issues

Kirkland & Ellis’ plan for a $500 million AI spend is a preview of where the legal market is headed: A world where only the largest firms can self-finance the technology that will define competitive advantage, Certum Group’s William Marra says.

Prediction Markets Trading Must Be Part of Compliance Policies

Prediction markets trading doesn’t just pose compliance hurdles for financial institutions. Pharmaceutical and technology companies, political organizations, and professional sports leagues also should consider adopting certain compliance frameworks to reduce the risk of their employees misusing confidential information to place trades, Debevoise & Plimpton attorneys say.

DOJ Enforcement Vacuum Opens a Strategy Window for Defendants

The thousands of criminal cases that the Justice Department quietly closed last year can be reopened at any time, so defendants should use the reprieve to plan a legal strategy, Sentencing Advocacy Group’s Joseph De Gregorio says.

America Needs One National Framework for Artificial Intelligence

US Reps. Jay Obernolte and Lori Trahan call for a national AI framework and explain why they’re releasing a bipartisan discussion draft because policy for a technology this transformative can only be built to last if it’s written by both parties.

Professional Perspectives give authors space to provide context about an area of law or take an in-depth look at a topic that could benefit their practice.

Popular Reads