A new defense for employers facing worker claims under California’s unique PAGA labor law can be found in a recent concurring opinion by a Ninth Circuit judge, attorneys say.
The reasoning of Judge Kenneth Kiyul Lee in a Feb. 12 concurring opinion could help break the link between arbitrators’ rulings for individuals and court proceedings of large groups of claims.
Arbitration proceedings under PAGA might not qualify as a “full and fair opportunity to litigate,” Lee said about a case involving wage violation claims against Lowe’s Home Centers LLC.
Lee’s observation could allow employers to force individuals into arbitration with ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.