- Class certified in 2019; replacements allegedly not like new
- Attorneys awarded nearly $27 million in fees
A $95 million class settlement resolving allegations that
The plaintiffs’ lawyers were awarded nearly $27 million in fees, close to their request, according to the order in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Vicky Maldonado and Justin Carter alleged Apple breached its extended warranty agreements when it sent out purportedly comparable replacement devices that weren’t equivalent to new, as the company had promised.
The class, certified in 2019, includes customers who bought AppleCare and AppleCare+ plans between July 20, 2012, and Sept. 30, 2021, and who received a refurbished device.
Some 153 class members opted out of the deal, and there were no valid objections, the court said in its April 29 order.
The court also approved a $15,000 incentive award to Maldonado and a $12,500 award to Carter.
Judge William H. Orrick preliminarily approved the deal late last year.
The plaintiffs’ lawyers had asked for nearly $27.6 million in fees.
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP represents the consumers. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP represents Apple.
The case is Maldonado v. Apple, Inc., N.D. Cal., No. 3:16-cv-04067, 4/29/22.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.