- Consumer plaintiffs will get second chance at advancing suit
- Judge cites dismissal of nearly identical suit against OpenAI
Judge
The 143-page complaint filed in 2023 alleged Google’s web scraping practices for obtaining data for its Bard AI model violated privacy, anti-hacking, and intellectual property laws.
In her two-page dismissal order, Martinez-Olguín only cited a dismissal of a nearly identical scraping lawsuit lodged against OpenAI Inc.
In that case, Judge Vince Chhabria, who sits on the same court, found the complaint against OpenAI was excessively long and meandering to a point that it wasn’t possible to determine which causes of action were alleged against the AI company.
The two lawsuits share some of the same plaintiffs, attorneys, and causes of action.
Clarkson Law Firm PC represents the plaintiffs. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC represents Google.
The case is J.L. v. Google LLC, N.D. Cal., No. 3:23-cv-03440, 6/6/24.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
