The workers nabbed summary judgment below on claims that Jack in the Box over-deducted their wages for a benefit fund, and the fast food brand landed post-trial relief on claims that it improperly deducted shoe costs from their pay. The lower court got both of those decisions wrong, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said.
- The district court was too ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.