The Fourth Circuit’s decision to re-hear en banc a privacy dispute over whether Virginia police’s use of phone location data violated Fourth Amendment protections could shape a constitutional question for the US Supreme Court.
Okello Chatrie, accused of robbing a bank in Richmond, Va. in 2019, sought to suppress evidence obtained from a geofence warrant key to his arrest, claiming police’s conclusions and methods were over-broad and unconstitutional. Despite agreeing with Chatrie’s Fourth Amendment arguments, the Virginia district court let the evidence stand because state investigators thought they had a valid warrant.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
