- Resolves claims Walmart didn’t pay workers during screenings
- $625,000 awarded in counsel fees, plus $118,000 refunded
Judge
“Plaintiffs entered settlement negotiations from a strong position, and were able to negotiate a fair and adequate settlement for the class,” Brnovich said in her order.
The class alleged Walmart failed to pay workers for time spent on their screenings before they clocked in for their shifts. The class includes workers employed at a Walmart retail store in Arizona from April 2020 through February 2022.
Brnovich gave preliminary approval to the settlement in US District Court for the District of Arizona in February. She said the settlement had gone through good faith negotiations, had no obvious deficiencies, and doesn’t provide preferential treatment to class representatives.
The settlement is appropriate because of the strength of the plaintiffs’ case, the risks and complexities associated with further litigation, and the risk of maintaining class status for over 80,000 people at trial, the order said.
The settlement agreement also provides $625,000 for attorneys’ fees and over $118,000 in counsel reimbursements, Brnovich wrote. Arrison and Smith will each be granted $5,000 service awards. The settlement administrator, Simpluris, will be paid roughly $207,000.
Lear Werts LLP represents Arrison, Smith and the class members. Dentons US LLP and Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer, & Feld represents Walmart.
The case is Arrison v. Walmart Inc., D. Ariz., 2:21-cv-00481, 7/15/24.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
