Microsoft claims it is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, or a new trial, because the verdict and award “are against the great weight of the evidence, and because IPA’s damages presentation was based on expert testimony that should have been excluded” as unreliable, in a motion filed in the US District Court for the District of Delaware.
IPA was required, but failed, to show that ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.