The US Supreme Court declined Monday to review a decision absolving
Ina Rodman alleged that although the Abilify label addressed the risk of tardive dyskinesia, which is characterized by involuntary movements of the face and jaw, it underreported how often patients develop the disorder.
She didn’t establish that Otsuka failed to warn of a knowable risk, the Ninth Circuit said last December, affirming judgment for the drugmaker.
The Abilify label reported that between 0.1% and 1% of participants developed TD during ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.