Ina A. Rodman alleged that although the Abilify label addressed the risk of tardive dyskinesia, it underreported the actual incidence rate—the percentage of patients on the drug who develop TD.
But the district court correctly excluded Rodman’s expert and then granted summary judgment for Otsuka because Rodman lacked evidence to support her claim, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.