Ina A. Rodman alleged that although the Abilify label addressed the risk of tardive dyskinesia, it underreported the actual incidence rate—the percentage of patients on the drug who develop TD.
But the district court correctly excluded Rodman’s expert and then granted summary judgment for Otsuka because Rodman lacked evidence to support her claim, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.