“The jury’s verdict is against the great weight of the evidence to such a material degree that a new trial is necessary,” Judge Rodney Gilstrap wrote in an order filed Monday in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
He agreed with Verizon’s arguments that no reasonable jury could have found it met certain limitations in the asserted patents and faulting the testimony one of plaintiff General Access Solutions Ltd.'s experts.
Cellco Partnership—which does business as Verizon Wireless—and its supplier
Attorneys for General Access Solutions didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Bartlit Beck LLP and Ward, Smith & Hill PLLC represent General Access. Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, The Dacus Firm PC represents Verizon. Baker Botts LLP represents Ericsson Inc.
The case is General Access Solutions Ltd. v. Cellco Partnership, E.D. Tex., No. 2:22-cv-00394, new trial granted 9/30/24.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
