The US Supreme Court rejected a case asking the justices to interpret a patent-infringement safe-harbor provision in a federal statute “solely for uses reasonably related” to the process winning government approval of a drug or medical device.
That language from Section 271(e)(1) of the Hatch-Waxman Act, a 1984 law governing the US system for regulating and shepherding to market generic drugs, was the focus of the petition filed by medical device maker
California-based Edwards had been unable to convince the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.