In a motion filed Monday, Cisco argued the judge’s Oct. 5 ruling included new theories of infringement and damages that Centripetal hadn’t presented and that Cisco had no chance to defend against.
Cisco said had it been aware the court was considering these different theories, its presentation would have changed and it would have offered additional evidence related to things like invalidity and damages.
It asked for a new trial “to permit Cisco ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.