A federal appeals court is set to take up a closely watched dispute over the “bump-up” exclusion—a polarizing insurance provision that dictates who pays for settlements in post-acquisition shareholder litigation.
The case at hand pits insurance broker and consulting giant
They’re sparring over whether the D&O bump-up exclusion bars insurance coverage for a $90 million settlement with shareholders who sued Towers Watson & Co. after it was acquired by Willis under an ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.