A Delaware state court ruling on a controversial insurance clause limiting payouts for post-merger shareholder settlements marked a win for corporate policyholders, but more definitive court guidance will likely be needed to resolve a pileup of high-stakes cases.
The “bump-up” exclusion has become a sticking point as directors and officers insurers seek to deny coverage for settlements, in acquisition-related cases brought by shareholders seeking damages, that could be characterized as an increase in the purchase price for the target company.
Such claims are a fundamental part of what D&O policies are intended to cover, policyholder attorneys said.
A Delaware Superior ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.