Judge Jorge L. Alonso gave the proposed employee class action a green light April 24. He rejected the fast food giant’s argument that the lead plaintiff lacked standing because she was never denied a job based on the no-poach policy.
“The argument misses the point of plaintiff’s alleged injury: Plaintiff alleges she suffered depressed wages,” Alonso wrote. “Plaintiff’s claim is akin to a supplier who sells at a reduced price ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.