Armstrong Teasdale LLP’s mandatory partner retirement policy doesn’t violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act because partners aren’t covered employees, the Eighth Circuit said Dec. 3, deciding a matter of first impression.
Looking to how the term has been interpreted by other courts, under the ADEA and other federal anti-discrimination laws, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit said equity partner Joseph S. von Kaenel wasn’t a firm “employee” when he was forced to retire at age 70.
In particular, the appeals court looked to a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decision in a disability bias suit, which established ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.