The US Occupational Safety and Health Administration didn’t violate administrative law procedures when it revised an interpretation letter for temporary scaffolding designs, a federal judge said.
An amended letter in 2020 by OSHA about its scaffolding regulation isn’t a final agency action that requires a notice and comment period, said Judge Richard Seeborg of the US District Court for the Northern District of California. Seeborg dismissed the suit after concluded Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District—an independent California agency that maintains the Golden Gate bridge—lacked standing in the case.
Golden Gate also didn’t demonstrate any injury from the 2020 ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.


