The class and a settlement objector, in supplemental reply briefs filed Dec. 21, argue the consumers suffered sufficient harm by Google’s practice of sharing their search terms with third parties to have standing to sue.
But Google and the federal government say the consumers can’t show they suffered a concrete injury from the disclosures.
- Objector Ted Frank argues Google and the government confuse weakness on the merits with lack of Article III standing. Their ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.