The plaintiffs plausibly argued they expected to avoid fees for overdraft and nonsufficient funds based on Bank of America’s public statements promising relief, without realizing the programs would end in August 2020, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the US District Court for the Northern District of California said in a Wednesday ruling.
“Plaintiffs have sufficiently pleaded that a reasonable consumer and average consumer would see BANA’s statement that it was helping ‘clients experiencing hardship from impacts of ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.