The investment agreement “can reasonably be interpreted to mean that changing Neumann’s rights” without his consent “is impermissible,” Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard wrote, giving Neumann’s breach of contract claims a green light.
Vision Fund’s arguments to the contrary rely on its interpretation of disputed facts, and dismissing the case on that basis would invert “foundational” legal principles by “asking the court ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.