- Softbank accused of relying on pretexts to scuttle stock buy
- WeWork directors already sued Softbank over collapsed purchase
Neumann, who was set to reap the biggest windfall from the transaction, claims
Rob Townsend, the chief legal officer at SoftBank, described the claims as “meritless” in an emailed statement. “Under the terms of our agreement, which Adam Neumann signed, SoftBank had no obligation to complete the tender offer,” Townsend said.
The stock deal was part of a bailout package from SoftBank after WeWork’s initial public offering failed last year. Neumann, the controversial face of the business, agreed to leave the board and, in return, would be able to sell as much as $970 million in stock to SoftBank.
The exit package for Neumann
Two independent WeWork directors then
SoftBank said WeWork failed to meet the deal’s specific conditions to move forward, citing regulatory concerns and a handful of government investigations into the company, including from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S.
Last week, SoftBank forecast a wider loss for the fiscal year ended in March saying it now expects to lose 900 billion yen ($8.4 billion), after estimating previously its net loss would total about 750 billion. The hit related to WeWork accounts for about 700 billion yen of the non-operating losses, including investments and loan commitments.
The company is scheduled to report final earnings for the fiscal year on May 18.
In the lawsuit, Neumann said he stepped down as WeWork’s chief executive officer and relinquished control of the company to SoftBank in exchange for the stock buy and promised financing. SoftBank immediately moved in and took over control of the board of WeWork’s parent,
Then SoftBank officials went to work trying to sabotage the deal by preventing the “roll up” of a Chinese unit, one of the conditions to closing the stock buyout, according to the suit.
When SoftBank was supposed to be using its best efforts to complete the tender offer, the Japanese company was “secretly taking actions to undermine it,” Neumann said in the complaint. He called some of the would-be stock buyer’s tactics “brazen.”
Neumann is asking a Delaware judge to force SoftBank into fulfilling its promises to make the stock buy and pay damages for their wrongdoing. No judge has yet been assigned to the case, but Chief Judge Andre Bouchard is overseeing the earlier suit filed by the WeWork directors
The case is Neumann v. Softbank Group Corp, Delaware Chancery Court (Wilmington)
(Updates with SoftBank writedown in eighth paragraph)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Joe Schneider, Anne VanderMey
© 2021 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.