The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in a Monday opinion affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of the case, saying the defendants’ individual actions didn’t plausibly suggest parallel conduct “because they are not sufficiently similar to each other as to ‘substance, timing, or effect.’”
Antitrust law requires evidence of an agreement, not just similar behavior.
The ruling ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.