- Unsealed filings show long-simmering tensions over proxy fight
- Board battle comes after U.S. moved to block Lockheed merger
A lawsuit unsealed Friday revealed long-simmering tensions between Chairman Warren Lichtenstein and Chief Executive Officer
The board fight surfaced as the unraveling merger complicates Lockheed’s efforts to develop hypersonic weapons -- a critical U.S. defense imperative because of recent Chinese innovations -- after the company planned to bring Aerojet’s propulsion systems in-house. The buyout also was seen as an early test of President
Lichtenstein paints the CEO and her allies as wrongfully using Aerojet resources to bolster their efforts to discredit his slate and win control. The board chairman founded Steel Partners Holding LP, which invested in Aerojet.
“None of the directors has the authority to tap the corporate treasury or the company’s resources, employees or advisors to advantage themselves in the election,” he said in the Delaware Chancery Court complaint. A judge set a Feb. 15 hearing on Lichtenstein’s
Drake and three other directors filed a countersuit Friday, accusing their opponents of using “improper means” in the corporate clash. Drake claims a dispute arose with Lichtenstein during the Lockheed deal that resulted in her threatening to leave the company. She accused the chairman of leaking information about their “difficult working relationship,” which prompted Aerojet officials to launch an investigation.
Lichtenstein hoped to derail the investigation with his lawsuit, according to the countersuit. He and “collaborators” on the board intend to mount a “board-room coup” -- just as the company tries to salvage the Lockheed transaction, according to the countersuit.
“Mr. Lichtenstein, who is completely aligned with fellow shareholders, has operated with integrity and transparency throughout his tenure on the board,” said Charlotte Kiaie, a spokeswoman for the chairman. “We look forward to exposing any and all unsubstantiated allegations in due course.”
An Aerojet spokesperson said Lichtenstein’s suit is meritless. “The company believes Mr. Lichtenstein’s decision to cause
The deal -- which calls for Aerojet investors to get $56 per share -- took a hit last month when the U.S. Federal Trade Commission
“Aerojet’s stockholders need a fully-functioning board to ensure compliance with the terms of the merger agreement, and a fully aligned management continuing to fulfill its fiduciary obligations to operate this company in the best interests of stockholders,” according to the countersuit. Lichtenstein wants to throw a wrench in the deal, the CEO and her allies claim.
The board chairman is telling industry insiders he’s “unhappy with Aerojet’s agreement to merge with Lockheed, he wants to replace the company’s CEO and he intends to take control of Aerojet if the merger falls through,” according to the countersuit.
(Updates with schedule for court hearing.)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Blumberg, Joe Schneider
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.