- First time a former president charged in a federal indictment
- Trump, his valet, accused of jeopardizing national security
Trump is accused of willfully retaining and mishandling classified documents, including top-secret nuclear information and war plans, after he left office. No other former president has ever been indicted federally, let alone faced national security claims.
Legal experts say that the US Justice Department has historically treated such cases as among the most serious.
“When you look at the information in the indictment, it’s remarkable, and it’s dangerous in terms of national security,” former Attorney General
Trump will be appearing in Miami before US Magistrate Judge
On Monday night, Goodman issued an order denying a request by media outlets (including Bloomberg News) to allow limited photography and video inside the courthouse and to immediately release an audio recording of the hearing. There is no online stream or other remote public access for the proceeding. Goodman said the press may renew their requests before Cannon once she takes over the case.
Defense Attorneys
Trump is considering a wide array of experienced criminal defense attorneys in Florida, a person familiar with the situation said. But because there’s no requirement to have his permanent Florida counsel enter an appearance for Tuesday’s hearing, Trump will be initially represented by two of his current attorneys,
The list of attorneys being considered has included
Trump, who insists that he did nothing wrong, has called the prosecution ridiculous and baseless. He and his supporters have questioned why other elected officials, notably President
Read More:
Ahead of Trump’s arraignment,
Showing Intent
One of the biggest challenges the government faces in making its case stick is showing intent, which is critical to state-secrets prosecutions.
Prosecutors cite Trump speaking about the need to safeguard classified information, as a presidential candidate in 2016 and after his election. They contrast that with a transcript of a recording they say shows him acknowledging in 2021 that he had held on to a military “plan of attack” that he hadn’t declassified while in office, Siegmann said.
“The DOJ is using many of those statements that he made against
Read More:
Trove of Documents
The indictment against Trump — in which his former White House valet and post-presidency personal aide Walt Nauta is named as a co-defendant — specifically charges the former president with unlawfully retaining 31 documents containing sensitive national security information, most of it classified at the Top Secret level. More broadly, the government claims he held on to more than 300 documents with classified markings after leaving the White House. Prosecutors could point to those larger numbers to argue for a stiffer sentence if he is convicted.
The number of documents at issue, along with their top secret contents, make this case more similar to past classified documents prosecutions the Justice Department decided to pursue, experts said. Pairing the national security element with allegations that Trump also tried to obstruct the investigation could prove a powerful combination at trial, Siegmann said.
“Once a jury believes that you lied, it’s far easier for them to convict you of other things,” she said.
Nauta is also to be arraigned on Tuesday.
“We can’t ignore the fact that it’s the president of the United States, who is the head of law enforcement and the intelligence community, doing this,” said Shane Stansbury of Duke University’s law school. “There’s an abuse-of-trust aspect to that.”
Read More:
Trump faces an array of legal threats as he pursues a second term. The federal case follows a New York state criminal case set for trial in Manhattan in March. That prosecution is over hush money payments made to a porn star just ahead of the 2016 election Trump won. He has pleaded not guilty and said it is part of a larger political program to take him down.
Special Counsel
“Our laws that protect national defense information are critical to the safety and security of the United States, and they must be enforced,” Smith said. “Violations of those laws put our country at risk.”
The case is US v. Trump, 23-cr-80101, US District Court, Southern District of Florida (Miami).
Read More
Trump Charged Over Secret Records in a First for an Ex-President Trump Indictment Highlights the Perils of Being His Lawyer Trump’s Die-Hard Base Faces Test of Loyalty After Latest Charges What Trump’s Many Legal Perils Mean for His 2024 Bid: QuickTake
(Updates with details of hearing and Trump’s laywers from fifth paragraph)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Joe Schneider, Misyrlena Egkolfopoulou
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.