A drug defendant wasn’t deprived of her right to be present at her sentencing hearing because the judge didn’t read the standard conditions of her supervised release, the Ninth Circuit said.
The ruling, issued Tuesday, underscored an already existing circuit split on how trial courts must treat certain sentencing conditions and ended with one member of the three-judge panel at the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit calling for en banc review of its 2006 precedent, which allows judges to skip pronouncement of those standard terms.
Judges must orally pronounce a sentence at a sentencing hearing, Judge Kenneth ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
