State police didn’t violate a man’s constitutional rights when they conducted a brief on-the-street pat-down before handcuffing him and taking him to a separate location to complete the more thorough hunt for drugs authorized by a search warrant, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled Dec. 2 (State v. Watts, 2015 BL 394821, N.J., A-21, 12/2/15).
“The initial search was limited in scope and did not bar the police from moving defendant to a more controlled location to complete the search for drugs in accordance with the warrant,” the court said in an opinion by Justice Barry T. ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.