NatWest Spoofing Case Breaches Non-Prosecution Deal, U.S. Says

U.S. prosecutors have told NatWest Group Plc that it is in breach of a non-prosecution agreement as a result of allegedly illicit transactions carried out by a group of former traders.

Federal prosecutors in Connecticut told NatWest in an Aug. 30 letter that it had “materially breached” the terms of a 2017 accord that saw the lender pay $44 million in penalties because of alleged “spoofing” trades that are now under investigation, according to a previously unreported filing.

The breach could expose the Edinburgh-based bank’s U.S. trading arm -- NatWest Markets Securities Inc. -- to criminal prosecution and other regulatory action that could have “material collateral consequences,” the Sept. 3 filing notes. The U.K. bank, formerly known as Royal Bank of Scotland, is currently majority-owned by the British state after a bailout during the financial crisis.

NatWest said in the filing it intends to engage in discussions with prosecutors about their “determination of the breach of the NPA, including why criminal prosecution of the conduct underlying the NPA should not be pursued.”

Amy Cayzer, a spokeswoman for NatWest in London, declined to comment. Spokespeople for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Connecticut and the Department of Justice declined to comment.

NatWest reached a non-prosecution agreement with U.S. authorities in 2017 to end a probe into allegedly fraudulent trading of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized loan obligations. Under the terms of the deal, the U.S. agreed not to prosecute the bank as long as it didn’t commit any further wrongdoing.

The bank, which reports third-quarter results on Friday, outlined the case of suspected spoofing in its 2019 annual report. The alleged trading took place in 2018, according to the report, and the spoofing investigation has resulted in repeated extensions of the NPA as the lender and prosecutors discuss any impact on the deal.

Read QuickTake: Spoofing Is a Silly Name for Serious Market Rigging

The case is a reminder of the legal woes that have trailed NatWest ever since its 2008 rescue by U.K. taxpayers in what was the biggest single bank bailout of the financial crisis. The firm, which, as RBS, once housed one of the world’s biggest investment banks, has faced billions of dollars in fines from issues including traders manipulating interest rates and currency markets and misselling mortgage-backed securities.

Publicly known breaches of settlement agreements with prosecutors are rare but have happened. In 2014, Standard Chartered had to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to extend its settlement by three years. And the Justice Department wrote to Swedish telecom network equipment manufacturer Ericsson this month accusing the company of breaching a $1 billion agreement it made with prosecutors in 2019 to end a long a running corruption probe.

Read more about Ericsson’s alleged breach

--With assistance from Stefania Spezzati.

To contact the reporters on this story:
Donal Griffin in London at dgriffin10@bloomberg.net;
Chris Strohm in Washington at cstrohm1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Tom Metcalf at tmetcalf7@bloomberg.net

Jeremy Hodges

© 2021 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.