“Full House” star
After battling charges of fraud conspiracy since they were announced in March 2019, Loughlin and Giannulli agreed this week to change their pleas and serve two and five months in prison. The U.S. agreed to drop charges of federal programs bribery and money laundering.
“Ms. Loughlin, do you understand the possible consequences of your plea this morning?” U.S. District Judge
“Yes, your honor,” she said. Giannulli said the same.
“Do you disagree with anything he says the government would be able to prove?” Gorton asked, referring to Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric Rosen.
“No, your honor,” they said in turn.
Then the clerk asked for their pleas, one at a time.
“Guilty,” Loughlin responded, followed by her husband.
The couple, who arrived together at the federal courthouse in Boston last year and sat side by side at the outset of their fierce defense, made a starkly different appearance at the virtual hearing on Friday. This time, each was seated separately in a Zoom box, accompanied by their lawyers.
Giannulli, who wore a dark suit and a bushy gray beard, sat with attorney
The couple paid $500,000 in bribes to get their daughters into the
Rosen said Loughlin warned her younger daughter in an email not to talk to her high school guidance counselor about how she was getting into USC as a crew recruit.
“It might be a flag for that weasel,” he quoted her as saying.
After their older daughter was admitted, Rosen said, Giannulli forwarded a $200,000 bill from the scam’s mastermind, William “Rick” Singer, to his financial adviser, writing, “Good news my daughter is in SC ... bad is I had to work the system.”
Both Loughlin and Giannulli told the judge they’d had a high school education.
The case, the biggest college admissions plot the U.S. has ever prosecuted, continues. Shortly after they entered their pleas, prosecutors announced that
Expect more deals, said
“I think other defendants are going to be asking their lawyers to call the government and get them a similar deal, and I think the government is willing to cut them,” Henning said. “They want guilty pleas, and they’ll accept them from other defendants if they come in and accept a similar agreement” to Loughlin and Giannulli’s.
In challenging the case, the California couple asked why it was brought by prosecutors in Massachusetts and why they were charged along with dozens of other parents they argued had no connection to them. They recently lost a bid to have the charges dropped over “outrageous government misconduct”; they claimed the U.S. withheld evidence helpful to them.
Their plea agreements allow Loughlin and Giannulli to advance claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial misconduct before the court if more evidence is developed.
“The government seems to be folding their tents with this,” Henning said. “They do get their highest-profile defendant to plead guilty,” but in the end “she could get a minimal amount of time in a federal prison camp.” He called it “a very good disposition for her.”
The couple didn’t lose any ground tactically by fighting the charges, he said, because it gave them time to marshal evidence about the alleged misconduct.
The Massachusetts U.S. attorney’s office rejected Henning’s suggestion that the government is looking to avoid trying the remaining parents, who are scheduled in two groups, in October and January.
“We’re ready for both trials,” said Christina DiIorio-Sterling, a representative for U.S. Attorney
More than 50 people have been charged in the case. Of the 37 parents, including Dameris, 24 have pleaded guilty. Their sentences have ranged from two weeks for actor
Loughlin and Giannulli’s plea agreements leave a dozen parents still facing trial. The first trial, which was to include the couple, was scheduled to start Oct. 5, subject to the court’s reopening. The second, beginning Jan. 11, includes private equity executive
None of the students or schools, from USC to Georgetown to Yale, were charged.
Gorton said he wants to read pre-sentencing reports for the couple before he accepts or rejects their pleas. He set their next hearing for Aug. 21.
By then some of the hiccups of the virtual courtroom may be worked out, if the proceedings are still by videoconference. On Friday, Loughlin’s lawyer had to work one out himself.
“You’re on mute, your honor,” he told Gorton.
The case is U.S. v. Sidoo, 19-cr-10080, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts (Boston).
(Updates with details of hearing and analysis throughout)
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
© 2020 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.