The
Federal prosecutors have issued subpoenas seeking information related to allegations that Cook misrepresented information on mortgage applications, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing the ongoing probe.
Trump said last month that he was removing Cook after
The fight over whether Cook can remain on the job has quickly emerged as the main flash point in Trump’s bid to assert more control over the Fed, which he has repeatedly called on to lower interest rates. In her lawsuit, Cook cast his attempt to fire her as a power grab that could cause “irreparable harm” to the US economy.
‘Primary Residence’
Pulte has claimed that Cook fraudulently listed homes in Michigan and Georgia as a “primary residence” when she obtained mortgages in 2021 to secure more favorable terms on loans. In response, Cook’s lawyers have said that if there were any errors she didn’t mean to deceive anyone, and no one was harmed, a standard known as materiality. They have also suggested that an unintentional “clerical error” may have been behind the dispute.
On Thursday, Cook’s attorney,
The Justice Department didn’t respond to a request for comment on the probe. The Wall Street Journal reported the investigation earlier on Thursday.
Trump insists that he has “cause” to fire Cook and said the allegations against her were sufficient because she’d been previously accused of lying in financial documents.
Following Pulte’s allegations, which he referred to the Justice Department, Trump wrote a letter to Cook saying that he was removing her immediately in light of her “deceitful and potentially criminal conduct in a financial matter.”
Cook has asked a judge to allow her to remain on the job while her lawsuit against the administration proceeds. The Fed hasn’t taken a position on the fight in court, only saying that it will respect any court rulings.
Trump filing
Meanwhile, the Justice Department on Thursday made fresh arguments about why Trump should be allowed to oust Cook while she challenges her removal, saying her claim that her termination is a pretext to get her out of the way and lower interest rates is “baseless.”
“Dr. Cook’s policy disagreements with the President cannot be used to immunize her from the consequences of her misconduct or removal for such a cause-based rationale,” the government said a the filing, which asks the court to deny Cook’s request for a temporary court order blocking her dismissal.
US District Judge
(Updates with new government filing in Cook’s lawsuit in 11th paragraph.)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Justin Sink
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.