- Judge says extradition would bring risks to Assange’s health
- U.S. attorneys will appeal London ruling in Assange case
A U.K. judge blocked
Judge Vanessa Baraitser ruled Monday that his extradition to face espionage charges would be oppressive because of the 49-year-old’s mental health, saying he was “a depressed and sometimes despairing man genuinely fearful about his future.”
Assange could be released from the high-security Belmarsh prison as soon as Wednesday, when his lawyers will return to court to make what they say are the “strongest grounds to granting bail” in light of Monday’s ruling.
Baraitser spent the first part of her ruling dismissing Assange’s arguments that prosecutors faced political pressure to send him to the U.S. and that he couldn’t receive a fair trial there. She said, however, that Assange would face “conditions of significant isolation” in U.S. prison. She cited
“In these harsh conditions, Mr. Assange’s mental health would deteriorate causing him to commit suicide with the ‘single-minded determination’ of his autism-spectrum disorder,” Baraitser said.
Assange is accused of working with U.S. Army intelligence analyst
Lawyers for the U.S. immediately said they would appeal the decision, a process that could take years. The Department of Justice is “extremely disappointed” in the court’s decision, despite being “gratified that the United States prevailed on every point of law raised,” it said in an emailed statement.
Appeal
President-Elect Joe Biden’s transition team declined to comment when asked if the Democrat’s administration would keep up the pressure for Assange to be brought to the U.S.
“This isn’t something we’re in a position to weigh in on during the transition, but would point you to what the President-Elect has said regarding the independence of his DOJ,” Biden’s team said in an emailed statement.
Extradition lawyers emphasized the high bar required to overturn the decision. The ruling is “going to be difficult to appeal because it’s a factual decision on his mental health,” said Ben Keith, an extradition lawyer in London who doesn’t represent anyone in the case. He said any appeal court would be unlikely to “interfere” with the findings.
Assange wore a dark navy suit and tie in the court, with a dark grey mask covering his mouth but not his nose. Throughout the judge’s hour-long ruling, his hands were clasped on his left knee.
Baraitser’s decision will be a surprise to the Australian’s supporters, who have openly been pinning their hopes on a pardon from U.S. President
Speaking outside London’s Old Bailey court building, Moris said she had to re-write her speech after the ruling. She called on Assange’s supporters to “shout louder, lobby harder until he is free” and addressed Trump directly as she made a renewed plea for his pardon.
“I call on the President of the United States to end this now,” she said. “Mr. President, tear down these prison walls, let our little boys have their father. Free Julian.”
She spoke to a crowd of supporters who flocked outside London’s central criminal court, cheering and waving signs. While most donned face masks, there was very little social distancing despite
Several British lawmakers also tweeted in support of the decision, including
Assange initially sought refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in 2012 rather than face questioning in a Swedish sexual assault case, which was later dropped. Last year, when he was expelled from the embassy, he faced American charges related to WikiLeaks disclosures.
(Adds comments Department of Justice, Assange’s fiancée)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Christopher Elser
© 2021 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.