At his May 10 arraignment, where Santos pleaded not guilty, US Magistrate Judge
The representative from New York now has all three lined up, according to a person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified because it isn’t public. All three guarantors recently have come to court to sign the bond, but their identities remain under seal, the person said.
Unusual Practice
That is a departure from typical federal court practice. Shields didn’t require Murray to identify the guarantors in open court on the day Santos was arraigned, as is usually done. Nor did they come forward when Santos was released, and advised of their responsibility to ensure his return to court, as is typically the case. No documentation about them has been posted on the public docket in federal court in Central Islip, New York.
Murray declined to comment on the guarantors.
The 13-count indictment against Santos accuses him of engaging in three schemes. Prosecutors allege he diverted political campaign donations to pay for personal expenses, claimed fraudulent unemployment benefits and made false financial disclosures to Congress.
Read More:
The charges come at a precarious time for House Republicans, whose narrow edge in the chamber means they can’t have more than a handful of defections to pass most bills. House Speaker
“Santos has a lot going on,” McCarthy said at the time. “I think he has other things to focus on in his life than running for office.”
The House has since referred a
‘You’re Not Getting That’
Santos faces as many as 20 years in prison if convicted of the most serious charges of money laundering and wire fraud, the government says. Under federal sentencing guidelines, his term would probably be shorter. His next appearance was set for June 30 before US District Judge
The congressman told reporters outside the courthouse on the day of his arraignment that he wouldn’t disclose the bond guarantors.
“You see, that is information you’ll never get,” he said, because “your intention is to harass them and make their lives miserable. You’re not getting that.”
Santos and his congressional office didn’t return messages Wednesday seeking comment on the matter.
High Bar
There is a high bar for the secrecy surrounding the guarantors.
In January FTX founder
Santos’s improbable rags-to-riches story rang alarm bells that led to the discovery of numerous falsehoods he purveyed, including that he had worked at
The case is US v. Santos, 23-cr-197, US District Court, Eastern District of New York (Central Islip).
(Adds details, quotes and context throughout, starting in second paragraph.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Jeffrey
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.