The practice of using of a restitution law to make criminal fraud defendants pay internal investigation costs and fees unprompted by the government might be in jeopardy in light of U.S. Supreme Court oral argument April 18 in a case involving General Electric Capital Corp.
Some of the justices expressed skepticism of the practice, though the argument of the ex-CEO convicted of wire fraud challenging it didn’t go unscathed.
Besides the millions at stake here, the high court’s ruling could affect payments in tens of thousands of restitution cases a year.
Ponzi-like Scheme
Sergio Lagos was convicted of defrauding GE ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
