Failure to Disclose Probe of Witness Violated Brady

March 23, 2011, 4:00 AM UTC

The fact that a government witness in a public corruption prosecution, who himself had pleaded guilty to similar charges, was also under investigation for sex offenses was “material” exculpatory information that should have been disclosed to the defense under the Due Process Clause as interpreted in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held March 11. (United States v. Kohring)

Under Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995), undisclosed information is material if there is a “reasonable probability” that, ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

See Breaking News in Context

Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.