A group of former
The US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois also denied the defendants a new trial.
The defendants argued, among other things, that by alleging bribery, the government assumed the burden of showing a quid pro quo but failed to. But Judge Harry D. Leinenweber said he wasn’t convinced.
The government’s case “was consistent with gratuities,” and the record contained sufficient evidence of a “this” for ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.