A man revived his lawsuit over a polygraph exam after the Third Circuit ruled Thursday that a New Jersey county’s polygraph examiner used a controversial method in a way that could amount to fabrication.
The lower court ruled that a flawed process isn’t the same as bad faith and granted Union County summary judgment, saying it can’t be held liable without evidence that the examiner violated the constitution.
But a jury could reasonably find that the examiner had reason to doubt the method he used after research, and departed from “accepted practices in the field of polygraphy” to produce a ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.