The evidence uncovered by Yahoo and
Along the way, the court said that internet content preservation at the request of the government wasn’t a seizure under the Fourth Amendment.
Carsten Rosenow argued that the two companies were acting as government agents under the Stored Communications Act and the Protect Our Children Act. He also said that the government was sufficiently involved in the searches to trigger Fourth Amendment ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.