The estate of Derrick Hambrick and his administrator in her individual capacity sued Wells Fargo under Georgia’s dram shop law, arguing that it served Maurice Watson too much alcohol at a bank function right before the collision that killed Hambrick. But the unpublished per curiam opinion by the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit said that though Watson was a Wells Fargo employee at the time, there was no admissible evidence supporting ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
