A district court wrongly concluded
Because Whole Foods’ marketing includes statements about how it vets its products, there was some possibility of recovery from the grocer, headquartered in Austin, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit said. The district court erred in dismissing warranty claims against Whole Foods and denying the family’s motion to remand, the court said.
Grant and ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.