The US Supreme Court said Monday that it will consider whether an appeals court improperly rejected a US soldier’s suit seeking to hold defense contractor
Winston Hencely contended that Fluor didn’t do enough to prevent a Nov. 12, 2016 attack that killed the bomber and five others, and wounded 17 more, including Hencely.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that the combatant-activities exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act barred Hencely’s suit. The exception exists to preclude state regulation of US military conduct and decisions.
The Supreme Court’s ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.