High Court Sides With Business on SEC Liability Requirement (3)

April 12, 2024, 2:20 PM UTCUpdated: April 12, 2024, 9:22 PM UTC

The US Supreme Court agreed that a “pure omission” in an SEC filing can’t give rise to a securities class action without some statement shareholders can point to that’s misleading.

The court’s narrow ruling Friday by Justice Sonia Sotomayor for a unanimous court agreed that some statement was required, but it didn’t go further to say how specific it must be.

Plaintiffs must identify “affirmative assertions” before a court can consider whether “other facts are needed to make those statements ‘not misleading,’” Sotomayor said.

The case concerns Item 303 of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-K, also known as ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn About Bloomberg Law

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.