Supreme Court Rejects Forfeiture Appeal in Synthetic Pot Case

Nov. 18, 2019, 2:38 PM UTC

The U.S. Supreme Court declined, over dissent from Justice Sonia Sotomayor, to take on the issue of criminal forfeiture in a case involving over $1 million that stemmed from an investigation into Nebraska head shops owned by a mother and son that sold synthetic marijuana.

The question was whether federal law authorizes forfeiture imposed jointly and severally among co-conspirators, or whether a 2017 high court case forecloses such liability.

Because forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 853, a law that applies to certain drug crimes, is limited to property that the defendant himself acquired as a result of the crime, ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

See Breaking News in Context

Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.