The US Supreme Court refused to shield Turkey’s state-owned
The ruling sends the case back to a federal appeals court, where Halkbank will have a chance to press an additional line of argument.
The bank wasn’t immediately available for comment. Following the news on the Supreme Court decision its stock price rose as much as 10% to 12.55 liras in Istanbul, the most since Jan. 16.
The justices rejected Halkbank’s core contentions that federal courts can’t consider criminal cases against foreign governments and the companies they own and that the 1976 US Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act shields the bank from prosecution.
Writing for the court, Justice
“Congress enacted a comprehensive scheme governing claims of immunity in civil actions against foreign states and their instrumentalities,” Kavanaugh wrote. “That scheme does not cover criminal cases.”
But Kavanaugh also said the New York-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals hadn’t fully considered a separate Halkbank argument. The bank contends the prosecution is barred under “common law,” the judge-made set of legal rules that sometimes apply when no statute governs.
“We express no view on those issues,” Kavanaugh wrote.
Two justices,
The charges against Halkbank have been a major source of tension between the US and Turkey. Prosecutors allege that Halkbank helped free up $20 billion of restricted Iranian funds and helped launder at least $1 billion through the US financial system.
The case is Turkiye Halk Bankasi v. United States, 21-1450.
(Updates with stock movement in third paragraph, excerpt from opinion in sixth.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.