The US Supreme Court has clarified the test courts should use when considering policy flip-flops when presidential administrations change.
Ruling April 2 in a case challenging FDA rejection of applications to sell flavored vaping products, the justices formalized an existing approach that lays out what an agency must do to support such a shift.
In doing so, the court answered a question left open after its landmark ruling last term curtailing deference to administrative agencies when it overturned the longstanding Chevron doctrine in Loper Bright v Raimondo.
University of Michigan law professor Christopher Walker said this was one “missing ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
