Senate Democrats seeking to hold the
Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats postponed their vote on subpoenaing GOP donor
Leo and Crow are in the spotlight for their ties to Justices
“Congress needs to understand the full scope of the courts’ ethical crisis,” Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, said at the start of the panel’s meeting Thursday. “Leonard Leo and Harlan Crow are central players in the ethics challenges facing the court. Their baseless refusal to respond to the committee’s valid inquiries prevents us from understanding the full scope of this issue.”
The subpoena push comes after the Supreme Court justices rebuffed the Senate Democrats’ oversight efforts. Chief Justice
The subpoenas to Crow and Leo serve a purpose beyond aiding the committee’s investigation into judicial ethics. They could create a new level of scrutiny on the wealthy people who develop close ties with Supreme Court justices and potentially disincentivize the kind of extensive giving that has shocked the public this year, court watchers said.
“The Senate taking action helps to reinforce what should be the norm, which is that people don’t get to pay for special access to Supreme Court justices,” said Lisa Graves, the Senate Judiciary Committee’s former chief counsel of nominations, who’s now a researcher and advocate for court ethics.
In a sign that the threat is already proving effective, the committee dropped its plans to subpoena businessman
Previously, the majority and minority leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee typically opted to sign off on subpoenas together. But the issues surrounding the Supreme Court have cracked open divisions, with Republicans accusing Democrats of a politically motivated vendetta against the court’s conservative majority.
“You are trying to create a political issue that I think crosses constitutional boundaries,” said Republican Senator
Though Crow and Leo aren’t accused of illegal conduct, Democrats say the subpoenas are needed to determine whether the justices acted improperly and could shine a light on their personal lifestyles.
Short of subpoenaing justices, “this is a good second-best strategy,” said Kent Greenfield, constitutional law professor at Boston College Law School. “There’s no serious constitutional question that they have jurisdiction to call private individuals to testify before them.”
But Leo has claimed the Senate Judiciary Democrats are violating his free speech rights and called the probe “political retaliation.” He’s also questioned the validity of the committee’s oversight of the court, saying legislation to create an ethics code would be “unconstitutional.” Legal experts say that will be a difficult argument to prove.
Crow’s lawyers have offered limited information spanning the last five years, while Leo has so far declined to comply with the investigation entirely. Durbin has said the two are “stonewalling” the committee’s investigation.
If Leo and Crow defy the subpoenas, the legal fight could get messy – and could be appealed to the high court to decide the fate of a probe into its own ethical controversies. After the subpoenas are authorized by the committee’s Democratic majority, they can either seek civil enforcement of the subpoenas in court – a move that would require a vote of the full Senate – or they could refer the failure to comply directly to the
Only a few times recently has Congress pursued criminal or civil enforcement when subpoenas were defied. The House referred former President
Thomas and Alito have faced the most scrutiny. Crow took Thomas on luxury vacations for years, and the billionaire real estate magnate bought three properties owned by the justice’s family in 2014. Thomas initially didn’t report on the transactions in his annual financial disclosures and only disclosed the sales and some trips
A different ProPublica report revealed billionaire hedge fund owner
Some justices have publicly said the Supreme Court is working on a new ethics code to clarify its conflict of interest standards. But in the absence of viable legislation or a court announcement, Senate Democrats are using the bully pulpit.
“The Senate and the American people deserve to know the full extent of how billionaires and activists with interests before the Court use their immense wealth to buy private access to the justices,” Durbin said in a statement. “The highest court in the land cannot have the lowest ethical standards.”
(Retops with vote being postponed.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Romy Varghese, Elizabeth Wasserman
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.