The US Supreme Court scrapped a planned March 1 argument over pandemic-era border restrictions after President
The administration said last month that on May 11 it will
The restrictions have let the Trump and Biden administrations quickly expel people more than 2 million times since early 2020 amid an unprecedented tide of migrants and worries about the spread of Covid-19. Though Biden is seeking to end the policy, doing so would mean a fresh set of challenges, forcing him to manage a new influx at the southern border.
The Supreme Court didn’t give any explanation for the move, which in all likelihood will keep the border restrictions in place until the government ends the Covid emergency.
The high court case involves a decision that said former President
The decision to cancel the hearing came on the court’s own initiative. Although US Solicitor General
Thursday’s action doesn’t necessarily end the clash. The justices could ask the two sides to file supplemental briefs or could simply hold the case to see how other legal skirmishes play out.
Republican opponents have suggested in a separate legal fight, now pending at a New Orleans-based federal appeals court, that they they will challenge the latest Biden move.
The Supreme Court case is Arizona v. Mayorkas, 22-592.
(Adds in fourth paragraph that court gave no explanation.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.