The US Supreme Court declined for now to let President
In a splintered decision, the high court declined to rule directly on Trump’s bid to lift a trial judge’s order that is keeping
The high court decision came in Trump’s first foray there since he started his second term with a torrent of measures designed to transform the government and assert sweeping presidential power. The Dellinger fight is part of a broader Trump effort to seize control of independent federal agencies.
The court gave only a limited explanation. It said Trump’s request would be “held in abeyance until February 26,” noting the “very short duration” of the temporary restraining order.
Liberal Justices
In its request, the administration urged the court to send a message to judges managing at least a dozen requests to pause White House initiatives involving the federal workforce, government spending, citizenship rights and
“This court should not allow the judiciary to govern by temporary restraining order and supplant the political accountability the Constitution ordains,” acting Solicitor General
Dellinger said in a court filing that Trump was trying to short-circuit the normal rules of litigation. He said the administration was seeking “a rocket docket straight to this court, even as high-stakes emergency litigation proliferates around the country.”
Dellinger was nominated by then-President
The special counsel’s office is an independent agency established in 1978 to protect federal government employees from prohibited employment practices, particularly reprisals for whistleblowing. The agency has authority to investigate alleged wrongdoing and file petitions on behalf of workers at the Merit Systems Protection Board, but the office can’t impose sanctions or press lawsuits against other government bodies.
The special counsel’s office isn’t related to the criminal prosecutions of Trump during Biden’s presidency by a lawyer with a similar title.
The case is Bessent v. Dellinger, 24A790.
(Updates with breakdown on court in fourth paragraph.)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Sara Forden
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.