State chief judicial officers urged the US Supreme Court to reject a sweeping ruling that would significantly limit state court authority to review election maps and rules, in a rare friend-of-the-court brief.
VIDEO: Legally Rigging Elections: Redistricting, a Brief History
The Conference of Chief Justices, which includes the top judicial officers of each of the 50 state and US territories, has filed seven other amicus briefs since 2002, according to a search of the Supreme Court’s docket, including in a 2015 case in which the justices agreed that state limits on judicial elections were constitutional.
The brief ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
